Da Vinci-true Renaissance Man
(Martin Kemp)
Dan Brown''s blockbuster novel The Da Vinci Code did not
single-handedly ignite a resurgence of interest in Leonardo Da Vinci, but it
certainly fanned the flames of one already in progress. The evidence is everywhere.
Leonardo''s own fascinating and well-written notebooks are available in various
editions. There have been numerous documentaries and books about him in recent
years, including Sherwin Nuland''s excellent entry in the Penguin Lives series. The
Da Vinci Code has done history fans a favor by encouraging publishers to
provide more nonfiction about this fascinating and mysterious figure.
Now comes Leonardo by Martin Kemp, an art history professor at Oxford and the esteemed
author of The Oxford History of Western Art. He understands Leonardo,
his works, his context and his influence. Kemp''s book is relatively short and
quite reader-friendly. It includes a helpful chronology and an annotated
gallery of Leonardo''s paintings, which comprise perhaps a third of the book''s
60 handsome illustrations. Kemp doesn''t waste time pasting together yet another
biography. Instead, he has written a scholarly but passionate essay. He wants
to try to understand Leonardo''s mind, the way his imagination united art and
science and brought them to bear upon each other.
Kemp has an excellent chapter called-Looking- that examines Leonardo''s
scientific notions about the eye and vision alongside his conception of the
artistic imagination. Other chapters explore his related ideas about the body
and machinery and his use of the ancient parallel between the human body and
the body of the earth. A final chapter surveys Leonardo''s posthumous fame, from
the 16th-century biography by Vasari to, inevitably, The Da Vinci Code.
Resumos Relacionados
- Secrets Of The Code: The Unauthorized Guide To The Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code
- Secrets Of The Code: The Unauthorized Guide To The Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code
- The Da Vinci Code
- The Da Vinci Code
- Mona Lisa E Da Vinci Possuiam Laços "familiares"?
|
|
