Resumo de The Categories Of The Professoral Judgment

In this text, Pierre Bourdieu approaches a question that if she directly relates to the dynamics of functioning of the Educational Field, especially in what professor-pupil alludes to the relations and the relations between the professors and its pairs. One is about a clarificação of the social mechanisms of construction of the categories of judgment of the professors regarding itself exactly and of its pupils. The first boarded subject in this work says respect to the practical knowledge, bedding of the analysis that the author will be useful to develop. For Bourdieu, the practical knowledge: (?)it is a practical operation of construction that sets in motion (?) classification systems that organize the perception and the appreciation and structuralize the practical one (P. 187). This practical knowledge if would organize from adjectives grouped in taxinomias, which: (?)but they exert its estruturante effectiveness in the measure where they are structuralized proper they (P. 187). Giving to continuity its work, the author initiates an analysis of the norteadora logic (underlying to the pertaining to school norms) of the categories of the professoral judgment, which would be: (?)appreciation and expression, thought forms that must its specific logic to the fact of that, produced and reproduced for the pertaining to school system, they are the product of the transformation that the specific logic of the university field imposes to the forms that organize the thought (P. 190). The categories of the professoral judgment would become related directly with notes attributed to the studied pupils, and would have as base the relative principles of social division to the hierarchy of the social classrooms (considered from the point of view of the ruling classes. The transformation of social criteria of classification in pertaining to school criteria of classification would be an operation of social, condicionante alchemy of a classification logic where: The same adjective it can enter in different combinations and receive from then on directions very diverse (P. 191-192). Such diverse directions would remain gifts same in the professorais evaluations of pupils whose note did not differ between itself from significant way, certifying of this form the not-pertaining to school character, but yes social them adjective components them categories it professoral judgment. Giving sequence to this ?diving? in the mechanisms of gênese, and functioning of the categories of the professoral judgment, Bourdieu affirms that the appreciations if would construct by means of: The representation that the professor has of beforehand of the hexis corporal of each one and of the evaluation that makes in function of strange criteria (P. 192). The hexis corporal would influence in this manner, in determinative way in the construction them appreciations, therefore: it supplies the system of indices through which a classroom origin is recognized (P. 193). Leaving of these results, Bourdieu would conceive the school as being a species of ideological machine, which: (?)receiving products socially classified it restitutes them pertaining toally school classified (?) in fact, this machine assures a narrow correspondence very enters the classification of entrance and the classification of exit (P. 195). Such machine, would come on the basis of to act the mechanisms produced for the pertaining to school taxinomias, that would be the proper one: Ideology in practical state, producing effect logical that they are inseparavelmente effect politicians, the pertaining to school taxinomia locks up an implicit definition of excellency who, constituting as excellent the appropriate qualities for whom they are socially dominant consecrates its way to be and its state (P. 196). As for the reproduction of the system of taxinomias of the professoral judgment, explicita Bourdieu the process of formation of habitus produced by the system of pertaining to school taxinomias, affirming that, thanks to: Objective structures become mental structures during a learning process that if fulfills according to in a universe organized according to these structures and submitted to the sanctions formulated in a language equally structuralized same oppositions, the pertaining to school taxinomias establish an in agreement classification the logic of the structures of which they are the product (P. 198). When comparing the speeches gifts in the intitled section necrológicas Notice of the old pupils, constants of the yearbook of the Superior Normal School of the years of 1962, 1963, 1964 and 1965, with the fiches of evaluation of the pupils of this institution, the author would have evidenced that the speeches gifts in the necrológicas notice of the old pupils if would structuralize, by means of the same principle of adjetivação observed in relation to the professoral judgment regarding the observed pupils. Not obstante this, the author calls attention for the imperious necessity of that: The establishment of a causalidade relation must be prevented mechanics between the social origin and the university success: classified products, the proper professors do not cease to classify itself, that is, its aspirations and choices of career precede the judgments that the system will make on its ambitions (P. 205). In this manner, habitus can be said that professoral, generated from the related system of categories of judgment would be a key for the agreement of the adjetivações bred and applied by the professors, also gifts in the relative adjetivações to its pairs.

Resumos Relacionados