Fin De Partie, Endgame
(Beckett, Samuel)
Nothing happens in a Beckett plays. No, this is not entirely true. Very little happens in Samuel Beckett?s plays. And the very little that happens often happens several times, until it becomes part of the greater blanket of nothing. In the form of his play Endgame, Beckett reveals his interpretation of life and nothingness, of existence and non-being, of wants and needs. He completed Endgame in 1956 after many months of frustration and rewrites. The staging of this work was almost as difficult as its creation, until Beckett finally found a theater in London that would put on the risky production. Reviews were mostly grim, and the comparisons to the ?better? work, Waiting for Godot, were frequent. In later productions, it met more critical success, and the original failure was explained by Endgame being a tricky play to stage, as so many of Beckett?s deceptively simplistic and minimalist works were discovered to be. In the decades that have followed the original production, Endgame has been rightly considered a modern masterpiece. The staging of Endgame adds to the senses of emptiness, of isolation, and of desperation. Endgame claustrophobically traps its characters in a bomb- shelter-like room with two tiny windows set up high and with curtains drawn. The audience along with the blind Hamm must rely on the servant Clov?s descriptions of the world beyond this hellish house. In a symbolic twist, the positioning of these windows, along with the other props on the stage seems to connote the inside of a man?s head, with the characters positioned along with the props. Thus, the characters onstage become figures of an inner consciousness, figures that might play within everyone?s minds. The nontraditional play structure of Endgame is typical Beckett in that nothing really appears to happen. In this one act play, four characters, Hamm, his servant Clov and his parents, Nagg and Nell, live out their time in a state of imprisonment by what some critics see as the years following a nuclear holocaust of sorts. The characters (with the possible exception of Nell) are trapped in a constant state of waiting for physical things. Nagg is waiting for his pap or a change of sand in his dustbin, Hamm is waiting for his sedative, and Clov is waiting for Hamm to die. Only Nell, who at this point is too far gone to care, does not proclaim a specific want or need, and her apathy culminates tragically later in the play. Beckett does not stop with the staging to create the very specific atmosphere of barrenness. Adding to the sense of imprisonment and loneliness, Endgame renders three of its characters immobile. Beckett shoves the elderly and decrepit Nagg and Nell in garbage cans from which they can only poke their heads out, while the autocratic and blind Hamm can only sit in his chair in the center of the stage. Clov, the only one able to move about freely, is cursed with the inability to sit and is portrayed in constant motion throughout the play. Springing from these limitations, as well as their original relationships with each other, the characters co-exist in a twisted world where the servant appears to need his master as much as his master relies upon him, where the elderly couple are cut off from each other and their narrow world and left in dustbins to rot away until their deaths. The characters both have nowhere to go and no way to get there. Because of the restrictions set by Beckett, the structure of Endgame is markedly repetitive and cycle. Trapped in their prison in Endgame, the four characters constantly seek patterns of life and even create patterns themselves when life deprives them of the customary routines. Hamm repeatedly tells his ?story? throughout the play. His story serves as one of many themes of Endgame, upon which Beckett relies since he has all but done away with any sort of driving actioon in the plot. Another important device that Beckett employs is the use of the window, through which only Clov sees and reports. The only window to the outside world, and both audience and Hamm alike must believe in the descriptions by Clov, who may or may not be telling the truth, who may or may not see anything at all. Throughout its single act, Endgame remains very conscious of its role as a theatrical work. Beckett includes overt allusions to Dante, to Waste Land, to Shakespeare. These works and many more, possibly some unrecognizable to any scholar besides Beckett himself, resonate throughout the play. They align Endgame into the larger living history of drama. For Beckett, drama reflects life as it goes full circle. And yet, the circle is flat, so the end is the beginning, the middle is the end, the beginning is the middle.
Resumos Relacionados
- Fin De Partie, Endgame
- En Attendant Godot - Waiting For Godot
- Waiting For Godot
- En Attendant Godot - Waiting For Godot
- En Attendant Godot - Waiting For Godot
|
|